This is the place where you can personalize your profile!
But, how?
By moving, adding and personalizing widgets.
You can drag and and drop to rearrange.
You can edit widgets to customize them.
The left side has widgets you can add!
Some widgets you can only access when you get a subscription.
Some widgets have options that are only available when you get a subscription.
We've split the page into zones!
Certain widgets can only be added to certain zones.
"Why," you ask? Because we want profile pages to have freedom of customization, but also to have some consistency. This way, when anyone visits a deviant, they know they can always find the art in the top left, and personal info in the top right.
Don't forget, restraints can bring out the creativity in you!
Now go forth and astound us all with your devious profiles!
Hmmm, this deviant wasn't banned so what rules did he break? I swear at times it's people like you that do not clearly know the rules themselves who speak as though they're the admins of this site.
Pfffft, pathetic waste of a post dude. You suck!
--
"Then I saw there was a way to Hell even from the gates of Heaven"
Ah, figures you wouldn't have taken the time to read the FAQ and point out the rule that you claim was broken. Not doing so shows how lazy you are and not knowing the rules also shows pure ignorance. Instead you simply state to me that I should look up the rule myself. I know the FAQ very well and I even encourage other deviants to read the FAQ’s page on my journal.
All you cared about is what YOU considered to be offensive. Heck you can't even define what it was that you found so disgusting other than to call it 'some sort of porn'. This CLEARLY shows a lack of any creative thought process other than to call it ‘some sort of porn’. You could have simply chosen NOT to view the deviation but instead YOU found it offensive then decided to play the ‘I’m a wanna-be admin’ by posting that Kinkdoll was breaking the rules that you haven't bothered to research for yourself.
I challenge you to read realitysquard's journal called Obscenity, Nudity, and Art". In case you fail to pay attention, realitysquared is an ADMIN and his journal entry sets a clear definition of what deviantart considers breaking of rules. I invite you to read another entry in realitysquared’s journal called Helpdesk vs. Report Violation. This entry also clearly defines what is and is not considered a proper report of violations.
Just in case you fail to read it, allow me to post his words: “• If you are going to report something for being pornography use our definition. • Bare breasts are not "pornography" • Seeing a vagina is not "pornography" • Seeing a penis is not "pornography" • Seeing a bare butt is not "pornography" • A sexy pose is not "pornography". • Spread legs does not mean the same as "spread vagina".
• Poor quality is not a violation. • "MySpace quality" is not a violation. • Poor quality is not a violation. • Blurry photographs are not a violation. • Poor quality is not a violation. • Family photographs are not a violation. • Poor quality is not a violation.”
So in closing, let me remind you that realitysquard is very educated and talented ADMIN who’s specialty is dealing with DA policy.
Peace…
--
"Then I saw there was a way to Hell even from the gates of Heaven"
Goodbye Ol' Friend
Pfffft, pathetic waste of a post dude. You suck!
--
"Then I saw there was a way to Hell even from the gates of Heaven"
John Bunyan
--
... and now for something completely different ...
The admins didn't ban this deviant nor did an admin delete the artists deviation. The artist chose to delete his deviations.
Yet here you are being the judge yet you are not an admin. So I state to you, who are you to decide what is and is not breaking the rules?
Perhaps you know which rule was being broken?
--
"Then I saw there was a way to Hell even from the gates of Heaven"
John Bunyan
--
... and now for something completely different ...
Instead you simply state to me that I should look up the rule myself. I know the FAQ very well and I even encourage other deviants to read the FAQ’s page on my journal.
All you cared about is what YOU considered to be offensive. Heck you can't even define what it was that you found so disgusting other than to call it 'some sort of porn'. This CLEARLY shows a lack of any creative thought process other than to call it ‘some sort of porn’. You could have simply chosen NOT to view the deviation but instead YOU found it offensive then decided to play the ‘I’m a wanna-be admin’ by posting that Kinkdoll was breaking the rules that you haven't bothered to research for yourself.
I challenge you to read realitysquard's journal called Obscenity, Nudity, and Art". In case you fail to pay attention, realitysquared is an ADMIN and his journal entry sets a clear definition of what deviantart considers breaking of rules. I invite you to read another entry in realitysquared’s journal called Helpdesk vs. Report Violation. This entry also clearly defines what is and is not considered a proper report of violations.
Just in case you fail to read it, allow me to post his words:
“• If you are going to report something for being pornography use our definition.
• Bare breasts are not "pornography"
• Seeing a vagina is not "pornography"
• Seeing a penis is not "pornography"
• Seeing a bare butt is not "pornography"
• A sexy pose is not "pornography".
• Spread legs does not mean the same as "spread vagina".
• Stop reporting "gratuitous nudity".
• Stop reporting "inartistic" nudity.
• Stop reporting nudity "in poor taste".
• Poor quality is not a violation.
• "MySpace quality" is not a violation.
• Poor quality is not a violation.
• Blurry photographs are not a violation.
• Poor quality is not a violation.
• Family photographs are not a violation.
• Poor quality is not a violation.”
So in closing, let me remind you that realitysquard is very educated and talented ADMIN who’s specialty is dealing with DA policy.
Peace…
--
"Then I saw there was a way to Hell even from the gates of Heaven"
John Bunyan
Previous Page123Next Page